Prince Harry’s security level was a hot topic in the UK recently, with a High Court reaching a verdict on whether or not he should be stripped of his protection while visiting the country. The ruling, issued by High Court judge Sir Peter Lane, went against Prince Harry’s favor.
The Duke of Sussex was not pleased when he found out he no longer qualified for security protection after moving to America with his wife Meghan Markle in 2020. This decision led to a series of court appearances, with the Duke winning the right to partially challenge the initial ruling.
Ravec, the committee responsible for protective security arrangements for members of the royal family, along with other agencies, was at the center of the legal battle. Despite the ruling going against Prince Harry, his spokesperson announced that he plans to appeal the decision.
In response to the ruling, a Buckingham Palace spokesperson declined to comment on the matter. Prince Harry’s legal team argued that he was being treated unfairly and singled out with this decision, especially considering the safety of his children.
The Government maintained that Prince Harry’s security should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, with Ravec entitled to make the decisions they did. Home Office lawyers emphasized that Prince Harry was no longer under regular review by Ravec but could be considered in specific circumstances.
After the ruling, the Home Office expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision and stated that they are considering their next steps. Prince Harry has previously spoken about the impact of losing his security during his interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2020.
Additionally, Prince Harry is facing legal issues in the United States, with concerns raised about his American visa processing. Former President Donald Trump has even suggested that if re-elected in 2024, he would consider deporting Prince Harry back to the UK for betraying the Queen.